Soft Tissue Repair and Tissue Healing Review
 
Navigation

Introduction

Phases Overview

Inflammation

Proliferation

Remodeling

Influences of Therapy

References

 
Introduction

The inflammatory and repair processes are no longer simple events to describe in the light of the ever increasing knowledge in this field. This review is only a brief resume of the salient events associated with tissue repair, with an emphasis on the soft tissues rather than the classical 'wounds' approach. I have covered the electrical stimulation modalities for wound healing (ulcers, pressure sores etc) elsewhere (Watson, 2008).

 

Tissue healing (or tissue repair) refers to the body's replacement of destroyed tissue by living tissue (Walter and Israel 1987) and comprises two essential components - Regeneration and Repair. The differentiation between the two is based on the resultant tissue. In Regeneration, specialised tissues is replaced by the proliferation of surrounding undamaged specialised cells. In Repair, lost tissue is replaced by granulation tissue which matures to form scar tissue. This review concentrates on the events and processes associated with the Repair process. The potential for stem cell based therapy to dominate in this field at some point in the future raises the possibility of regeneration of the damaged tissue which would be clinically preferable, but as yet this treatment option remains largely lab based, or at best, experimental in clinical practice.

 

Probably the most straightforward way to describe the healing process (Repair) is to divide it up into broad stages which are not mutually exclusive and overlap considerably. There are several different ways to ‘divide up’ the entire process, but the allocation of 4 phases is common and will be adopted here – these being BLEEDING, INFLAMMATION, PROLIFERATION and REMODELLING.

 

In addition to the historically established texts (Walter and Israel, 1987; Hardy, 1989; Peacock, 1984) some more recent and detailed texts can be found at Serhan et al, 2010; Granger and Senchenkova, 2010; Pitzer, 2006; Broughton et al, 2006). The key information in this paper has been previously published in Watson, 2003; 2006 and the most recent review is in Watson 2020.

 
Overview of the Phases

A brief overview of each phase is presented here before considering them in any detail. Figure 1 refers to a general arrangement of the phases.

Figure 1 is a gross representation of the key phases of the tissue repair process. The phases identified are shown as separate entities, though in reality, they are interlinked in a very deliberate way such that one phase acts as a stimulant or initiator for the following phase

Figure 2 illustrates the integrated reality of repair rather than the ‘convenient’ separate phase model

Bleeding Phase : Overview

This is a relatively short lived phase, and will occur following injury, trauma or other similar insult. Clearly if there has been no overt injury, this will be of little or no importance, but following soft tissue injury, there will have been some bleeding. The normal time for bleeding to stop will vary with the nature of the injury and the nature of the tissue in question. The more vascular tissues (e.g. muscle) will bleed for longer and there will be a greater escape of blood into the tissues. Other tissues (e.g. ligament) will bleed less (both in terms of duration and volume). It is normally cited that the interval between injury and end of bleeding is a matter of a few hours (4-6 hours is often quoted) though this of course is the average duration after the average injury in the average patient. Some tissues may continue to bleed for a significantly longer period, albeit at a significantly reduced rate.

 

Inflammatory Phase : Overview

The inflammatory phase is an essential component of the tissue repair process and is best regarded in this way rather than as an 'inappropriate reaction' to injury. There are, of course, numerous other initiators of the inflammatory process (e.g. repetitive minor trauma, mechanical irritation), though for the purpose of this paper, the injury model will be adopted. The inflammatory phase has a rapid onset (few hours at most) and swiftly increases in magnitude to its maximal reaction (1-3 days) before gradually resolving (over the next couple of weeks). It can result in several outcomes (see below) but in terms of tissue repair, it is normal and essential. The onset and resolution are swifter in more vascular tissues and slower in the relatively poorly vascularised tissues. The alternative initiators of the inflammatory events include mechanical irritation, repeated minor trauma, excessive heating and cooling plus others that may be less significant in therapy such as infection and a wide range of autoimmune disorders. The inflammatory events are essentially the same whichever 'route' is relevant for the initiation.

Proliferation Phase : Overview

The proliferative phase essentially involves the generation of the repair material, which for the majority of musculoskeletal injuries, involves the production of scar (collagen) material. The proliferative phase has a rapid onset (24-48 hours) but takes considerably longer to reach its peak reactivity, which is usually between 2-3 weeks post injury (the more vascular the tissue, the shorter the time taken to reach peak proliferative production). This peak in activity does not represent the time at which scar production (repair) is complete, but the time phase during which the bulk of the scar material is formed. The production of a final product (a high quality and functional scar) is not achieved until later in the overall repair process. In general terms it is usually considered that proliferation runs from the first day or two post injury through to its peak at 2-3 weeks and decreases thereafter through to a matter of several months (typically 4-6) post trauma.

Remodelling Phase : Overview

The remodelling phase is an often overlooked phase of repair in terms of its importance, especially in the context of therapy and rehabilitation. It is neither swift nor highly reactive, but does result in an organised, quality and functional scar which is capable of behaving in a similar way to the parent tissue (that which it is repairing). The remodelling phase has be widely quoted as starting at around the same time as the peak of the proliferative phase (2-3 weeks post injury), but more recent evidence would support the proposal that the remodelling phase actually starts rather earlier than this, and it would be reasonable to consider the start point to be in the first week.

 

The final outcome of these combines events is that the damaged tissue will be repaired with a scar which is not a ‘like for like’ replacement of the original, but does provide a functional, long term ‘mend’ which is capable of enabling quality recovery from injury. For most patients, this is a process that will occur without the need for drugs, therapy or other intervention. It is designed to happen, and for those patients in whom problems are realised, or in whom that magnitude of the damage is sufficient, some ‘help’ may be required in order to facilitate the process. It would be difficult to argue that therapy is ‘essential’ in some sense. The body has an intricately complex and balanced mechanism through which these events are controlled. It is possible however, that in cases of inhibited response, delayed reactions or repeated trauma, therapeutic intervention is of value.

 

It would also be difficult to argue that there was any need to change the process of tissue repair. If there is an efficient (usually) system through which tissue repair is initiated and controlled, why would there be any reason to change it? The more logical approach would be to facilitate or promote the normality of tissue repair, and thereby enhance the sequence of events that take the tissues from their injured to their ‘normal’ state. This is the argument that will be followed in this paper – the promotion of normality, rather than trying to achieve a better normality. The best of the available evidence would also support this approach.

If the tissue repair process is slowed, stalled or in some way delayed, encouraging the 'normal' sequence is the best evidenced way forward. This can be achieved with the same essential techniques as those used for a 'normally' progressing repair sequence, though it may take a 'stronger' or more 'intense' therapy to initiate a tissue response.

Figure 3 represents the often encountered 'delayed' healing seen by many therapists

In therapy practice, our view of tissue repair is somewhat skewed by the patients that are seen (Figure 3). The majority of patients whose tissues are repairing 'on track' do not need therapy help in order to achieve a quality result. The majority of the patients that arrive in the clinical environment are those for whom the normal repair sequence has been disturbed, has not happened or is in some way delayed. Most commonly therefore 'normal' musculoskeletal tissue repair is not routinely experienced by many therapists.

 

 

The mechanism through which therapy can be effective throughout the repair sequence is becoming better understood, though as a general comment, these effects appear to be achieved by 'stimulating' rather than 'changing' the events.

 
Inflammatory Events

 

 

Inflammation is a normal and necessary prerequisite to healing (Aller et al, 2006; Hardy 1989; Serhan et al 2010 with Medzhitov (2008) and more recently, Dakin et al (2014) and Rees et al (2014) providing insightful analyses). Following the tissue bleeding which clearly will vary in extent depending on the nature of the damage, a number of substances will remain in the tissues which make a contribution to the later phases. Fibrin and fibronectin form a substratum which is hospitable to the adhesion of various cells.

 

The complex chemically mediated amplification cascade that is responsible for both the initiation and control of the inflammatory response can be started by numerous events, one of which is trauma. Mechanical irritation, thermal or chemical insult, and a wide variety of immune responses are some of the alternative initiators, and for a wide range of patients experiencing an inflammatory response in the musculoskeletal tissues, these are more readily identified causes. For the purposes of this review, only the traumatic route will be pursued though the key events and control systems involved in an inflammatory response subsequent to mechanical irritation etc are all but identical.

Figure 4: Some of the major chemical mediation families involved in inflammation

There are two essential elements to the inflammatory events, namely the vascular and cellular cascades. Importantly, these occur in parallel and are significantly interlinked. Figure 5 summarises the essential elements of the inflammatory cascade. The chemical mediators that make an active contribution to this process are myriad. They are usefully summarised in several reviews including Jiminez and Jiminez, (2004) and Singer and Clark (1999). Whilst these are clearly not the newest reviews, they do provide a useful background to the topic. Smith et al (2008) provide a useful review of the mediators associated with muscle injury, whilst Molloy et al (2003) have reviewed the role of these mediators in relation to ligament and tendon injury. Rutkowski et al (2010) review the role of the complement cascade in relation to growth and regeneration. A more detailed account can be found in Serhan et al (2010).

 

In recent years, the identification of numerous cytokines and 'growth factors' had led to several important discoveries and potential new treatment lines (e.g. Wagner et al 2003; Leung et al 2006). The effect of various therapies on the cytokine cascades is becoming more obvious with the increasing volume of research in this field (further reference support in the latter part of this paper).

Vascular events

 

In addition to the vascular changes associated with bleeding, there are also marked changes in the state of the intact vessels. There are changes in the calibre of the blood vessels, changes in the vessel wall and in the flow of blood through the vessels. Vasodilation follows an initial but brief vasoconstriction and persists for the duration of the inflammatory response. Flow increases through the main channels and additionally, previously dormant capillaries are opened to increase the volume through the capillary bed.

 

The cause of this dilation is primarily by chemical means (histamine, prostaglandins and complement cascade components C3 and C5 and many others) whilst the axon reflex and autonomic system may exert additional influences. There is an initial increase in velocity of the blood followed by a prolonged slowing of the stream. The white cells marginate, platelets adhere to the vessel walls and the endothelial cells swell.

 

In addition to the vasodilation response, there is an increase in the vasopermeability of the local vessels (also mediated by numerous of the chemical mediators), and thus the combination of the vasodilation and vasopermeability response is that there is an increased flow through vessels which are more ‘leaky’, resulting in an increased exudate production.

 

The flow and pressure changes in the vessels allows fluid and the smaller solutes to pass into the tissue spaces. This can occur both at the arterial and venous ends of the capillary network as the increased hydrostatic pressure is sufficient to overcome the osmotic pressure of the plasma proteins. The vessels show a marked increase in permeability to plasma proteins. There are several phases to the permeability changes but essentially, there is a separation of the endothelial cells, particularly in the venules, and an increased escape of protein rich plasma to the interstitial tissue spaces. The chemical mediators responsible for the permeability changes include histamine, serotonin (5-HT), bradykinin and leukotreines together with a potentiating effect from the prostaglandins.

The effect of the exudate is to dilute any irritant substances in the damaged area and due to the high fibrinogen content of the fluid, a fibrin clot can also form, providing an initial union between the surrounding intact tissues and a meshwork which can trap foreign particles and debris. The meshwork also serves as an aid to phagocytic activity (see below). Mast cells in the damaged region release hyaluronic acid and other proteoglycans which bind with the exudate fluid and create a gel which limits local fluid flow, and further traps various particles and debris (Hardy 1989).

Figure 5 : Key Inflammatory elements

Cellular events

 

The cellular components of the inflammatory response include the early emigration (within minutes) of the phagocytes (neutrophils; polymorphonucleocytes or PMN's) from the vessels. This is followed by several other species leaving the main flow, including monocytes, lymphocytes, eosinophils, basophils  (Lorena et al 2002) and smaller numbers of red cells (though these leave the vessel passively rather than the active emigration of the white cells). Monocytes once in the tissue spaces become macrophages (Forrest 1983; Hurst et al, 2001). The main groups of chemical mediators responsible for chemotaxis are some components of the complement cascade, lymphokines, factors released for the PMN's and peptides released from the mast cells in the damaged tissue (Rankin, 2004; Egozi et al 2003; Luster, 1998; Vernon-Roberts 1988). Butterfield et al (2006) usefully consider the beneficial and the potentially detrimental effects of neutrophila and macrophages in inflammation.

 

The PMN escapees act as early debriders of the wound. Numerous chemical mediators have been identified as having a chemotactic role, for example, PDGF (platelet derived growth factor) released from damaged platelets in the area. Components of the complement cascade (C3a and C5a), leukotreines (released from a variety of white cells, macrophages and mast cells) and lymphokines (released from polymorphs) have been identified (see Walter and Israel 1987; Vernon-Roberts 1988; Dierich et al 1987; Smith et al 2008)

 

These cells exhibit a strong phagocytic activity and are responsible for the essential tissue debridement role. Dead and dying cells, fibrin mesh and clot reside all need to be removed. As a ‘bonus’, one of the chemicals released as an end product of phagocytosis is lactic acid which is one of the stimulants of proliferation – the next sequence of events in the repair process.

 

The inflammatory response therefore results in a vascular response, a cellular and fluid exudate, with resulting oedema and phagocytic activation. The complex interaction of the chemical mediators not only stimulates various components of the inflammatory phase, but also stimulates the proliferative phase. The course of the inflammatory response will depend upon the number of cells destroyed, the original causation of the process and the tissue condition at the time of insult.

 

Inflammatory outcomes

 

Resolution is a possible outcome at this stage on condition that less than a critical number of cells have been destroyed. For most patients that come to our attention, this is an unlikely scenario unless tissue irritation rather than overt damage is the initiator. There is some considerable debate with regard 'micro injury' or 'micro trauma' and whether it leads to a repair event or a resolution. It is possible that they should result in a micro repair, and if the tissues fail to respond in this way, the microdamaged tissue fails to mount a repair response, thus resulting in accumulative damage and possible longer term issues. This debate continues with interesting evidence e.g. Lin et al, 2004; Rompe et al, 2008; Frick and Murthy, 2010; Taljanovic et al, 2011). Widgerow (2012) authors an interesting paper looking at the naturally occurring 'stop' signals for the inflammatory events.

Figure 6 : Inflammatory Outcomes

Suppuration, in the presence of infective micro-organisms will result in pus formation. Pus consists of dead cell debris, living, dead and dying polymorphs suspended in the inflammatory exudate. Clearly the presence of an infection will delay the healing of a wound (Zederfelt 1979). Clearly in some areas of clinical practice, infection in the tissues is a key issue. Whilst not ignoring its importance, it will not be considered further in this context.

 

Chronic inflammation does not necessarily imply inflammation of long duration, and may follow a transient or prolonged acute inflammatory stage (Vernon-Roberts 1988). Essentially there are two forms of chronic inflammation : either the chronic reaction supervenes on the acute reaction or may in fact develop slowly with no initial acute phase (ab initio) (Hurley 1985). Chronic inflammation ab initio can have many causes including local irritants, poor circulation, some micro-organisms or immune disturbances. Chronic inflammation is usually more productive than exudative - it produces more fibrous material than inflammatory exudate. Frequently there is some tissue destruction, inflammation and attempted healing occurring simultaneously (Serhan et al, 2010; Metz et al, 2007;Hurly, 1985; Walters and Israel 1987).

 

Healing/ Repair by fibrosis will most likely be taking place in the tissue repair scenario considered here. The fibrin deposits from the inflammatory stage will be partly removed by the fibrinolytic enzymes (from the plasma and PMN's) and will be gradually replaced by granulation tissue which becomes organised to form the scar tissue. Macrophages are largely responsible for the removal of the fibrin, allowing capillary budding and fibroblastic activity to proceed (proliferation). The greater the volume of damaged tissue, the greater the extent of, and the greater the density of the resulting scar tissue. Chronic inflammation is usually accompanied by some fibrosis even in the absence of significant tissue destruction (e.g. Hurley 1985; Li et al, 2007)

 

The effects of acute inflammation are largely beneficial. The fluid exudate dilutes the toxins and escaped blood products include antibodies (and systemic drugs). The fibrinogen forms fibrin clots providing a mechanical barrier to the spread of micro-organisms (if present) and additionally assists phagocytosis. The gel like consistency of the inflammatory exudate also makes a positive contribution by preventing the spread of the inflammatory mediators to surrounding, intact tissues. Transportation of invading bacteria (if present) to the lymphatic system stimulates an immune response whilst the increased blood flow contributes to the increased cell metabolism necessary for the proliferative stage by increasing local oxygen content, supply of necessary nutrients and removal of waste products. The leucocytes provide a mechanism for the phagocytosis of foreign material, bacteria, dead cells, with the neutrophils (PMN's) and monocytes (becoming macrophages) making the greatest contribution.

 

There are several detrimental aspects of inflammation which deserve mention. Firstly the increased local hydrostatic pressure from the oedema can restrict blood flow if the injured tissue space is limited, produce pain and therefore limit function and additionally reduce local oxygen levels. There have been suggestions that free radicals produced as a result of acute inflammatory responses may have detrimental effects on cell membrane processes as may overproduction of lysosomal enzymes from PMN activity.

 

There are many aspects of the inflammatory events that can be influenced by therapeutic intervention, ranging from the mechanical to the biochemical. There is a growing body of evidence to support the effects of manual and exercise therapy on the ‘soup’ of chemical mediators, cytokines and growth factors. Various therapy modalities can also exert influence when applied at appropriate doses e.g. (there are hundreds of these papers - this is a mini selection):

Exercise and Mechanical Stress

  • Caltrioni et al (2008) – link between exercise and plasma glycosaminoglycan levels

  • Fujiwara et al (2005) - mechanical stress and bFGF

  • Handschin and Spiegelman (2008) - exercise and PGC1a

  • Kahn and Scott (2009) - mechanical stress and IGF

  • Kido et al (2009) - mechanical stress and IL-11 expression

  • Li et al (2004) Mechanical stretching and fibroblast behaviour

  • Ostrowski et al (2000) – link between exercise and Interleukin-6 (IL-6) production

  • Palomares et al (2009) – link between mechanical loading, bone repair and various mediators and cytokines

  • Takao et al (2011) - mechanical stress and COX-2, interleukin-1β, PGE2

 

Ultrasound (LIPUS and Traditional)

  • Khanna et al (2009) - LIPUS and a range of cytokine actions reviewed

  • Leung et al (2006) –ultrasound and TGF-β in knee ligament healing

  • Li et al (2003) - LIPUS and various cytokines (TNF-a and TGF-β1 and IL-6)

  • McBrier et al (2007) - US and Mechano Growth Factor (MGF)

  • Nussbaum and Locke (2007) - US and Heat Shock Proteins

  • Rego et al (2010) - US and PGE2 synthesis

  • Sugita et al (2008) - US and nitric oxide (NO)

 

Laser

  • Bjordal et al (2006) - laser therapy and altered prostaglandin levels in the tissue (Achilles tendon)

  • dos Santos et al (2014) illustrating that capacity of laser to influence a range of inflammatory biomarkers

  • Marcos et al (2011) – links between laser therapy, COX-2 and PGE2 expression

  • Mesquita Ferrari et al (2011) - laser therapy, TNF-a and TGF-β

  • Pires et al (2011) – links between laser therapy and inflammatory mediators

  • Safavi et al (2008) - laser and a range of inflammatory cytokines

  • Sawasaki et al (2009) - laser and mast cell degranulation

  • Saygun et al (2008) - laser therapy and bFGF and IGF-1

 

Other Therapies

  • Zhang et al (2004) – demonstrated link between electroacupuncture and peripheral inflammatory responses

  • Sakurai et al (2008) - magnetic fields and prostaglandin E2 secretion

  • Zhang et al (2014) and Wang et al (2011) are amongst numerous studies illustrating the relationship between shockwave and inflammatory modulation effects.

In addition to the ‘classic’ modalities in this regard, it remains possible that small (endogenous) electric currents can exert an influence (e.g. Watson, 2008). The application of microcurrent based therapies is thought to enhance this component of the inflammatory/repair sequence (reviewed in Poltawski and Watson, 2009) and whilst most electrical stimulation modalities do not have a direct influence on the tissue repair sequence, microcurrent based therapies do appear to be increasingly supported by the research evidence in this regard.

 
 Proliferative Events

The repair process restores tissue continuity by the deposition of repair (scar) tissue. This is initially granulation tissue which matures to form scar tissue. Repair tissue is a connective tissue distinct right from the onset in several ways from the connective tissue native to the site (Forrest 1983). Interesting recent developments have identified that in muscle there is a degree of regenerative activity post trauma, linked to the activation of a mechanosensitive growth factor and subsequent activation of muscle satellite (stem) cells (Hill et al 2003). A range of growth factors have been identified as being active in the processes of proliferation, leading again to some new potential treatments (e.g. Hildebrand et al 1998).

 

The source of the majority of these cytokines is the inflammatory phase, thus 'turning off' or limiting the inflammatory events also reduces the signal strength stimulating these proliferative events (e.g. Boursinos et al, 2009; Beck et al, 2005; Dimmen et al, 2009; Radi et al, 2005).

 

Two fundamental processes involved in the repair are fibroplasia and angiogenesis (Figure 7). The function of the fibroblast is to repair the connective tissue (Vanable 1989).

 

Fibroblasts appear to migrate to the area from surrounding tissue. Fibroblastic activation appears to be chemically mediated, particularly by chemicals released from the macrophages during the inflammatory stage. Fibroblasts migrate into the damaged area and proliferate within the first few days after the tissue damage. Macrophage Derived Growth Factors (MGDF's) are a complex group of mediators responsible, at least in part for the activation of fibroblasts.

Figure 7 : Key Proliferative elements

Alongside the fibroblastic activation, capillaries in the region of the tissue damage bud and grow towards the repair zone. Loops and arcades are formed together with anastamoses which re-establish a blood flow through the region, providing oxygen and nutrients whilst removing metabolic and repair waste products. Oxygen is critical for many of the reparative processes, but especially for collagen production (Vanables 1989, Niinikoski 1980). A wide range of growth factors and chemical mediators have been identified which exert influences on the developing capillaries. These include macrophage derived factors, PDGF, lactic acid and fibroblast growth factor (Vernon-Roberts 1988). Some of these mediators are produced during the inflammatory phase, thus making an essential link between the inflammatory and proliferative phases. Li et al (2005) provide a review of the essential nature of the angiogenic events in the repair sequence. Numerous researchers (e.g. Oryan et al, 2012) have illustrated that the healing rate varies between tissues - being slow for example in ligament, which given its relatively poor vascularity is almost predictable.

 

There is growing evidence that various therapies are able to (positively) influence these proliferative and angiogenic events include :

 

  • Azuma et al (2001) demonstrate that LIPUS influences angiogenesis in relation to fracture healing.

  • Reher et al (2002) demonstrate influence of ultrasound in relation to NO and PGE2 production.

  • Zhao et al (2004) demonstrate link between electrical stimulation and angiogenic enhancement by means of VEGF mediated response.

  • Fitzsimmons et al (2008) demonstrate link between pulsed electric fields, chondrocyte activity and nitric oxide pathways .

  • Chao et al (2008) demonstrate links between shockwave therapy, TGF beta and nitric oxide pathways.

  • Rego et al (2010) ultrasound stimulation of prostaglandin (PGE2) synthesis.

  • Cheung et al (2011) ultrasound (LIPUS) and angiogenesis in osteoporotic fractures

  • Kuo et al (2009) shockwave therapy increases several cytokines including VEGF in a wound healing model

  • Bossini et al (2009) demonstrate the influence of laser therapy on the angiogenic events in wound repair

  • Lu et al (2008) ultrasound (LIPUS) and VEGF regulation in fracture healing

 

Granulation tissue invasion follows the 'demolition' phase (when autolytic enzymes are released from PMN's and dead cells) (Walter and Israel 1987). The activation of fibroblasts and capillary budding would normally occur by about the third day after the tissue insult. The combination of capillary budding and collagen production results in a more vascular than usual repair site. The fibroblasts initially produce predominantly type III collagen which will become type I collagen as the repair matures – during remodelling (Walter and Israel 1987).

Figure 8 : Fibroblast activity during proliferation

Fibroblasts also produce fibronectins and proteoglycans which are essential components of the ground substance (Figure 8) (Walter and Israel 1987, Forrest 1983, Hardy 1989).

 

Myofibroblasts are derived from fibroblasts activated by a variety of chemical mediators, and are responsible for wound contraction and the early strength of the repair. They draw the edges of the wound together, thus reducing the size of the final scar (Gabbiani 2003; Lorena et al 2002; Peacock 1984; Hardy 1989; Wipff et al, 2009; McAnulty, 2007).

Granulation tissue matures with lymphatic development (in much the same way as capillary development), nerve fibre ingrowth and mast cell invasion. Collagen fibres are oriented in response to local stress thus providing tensile strength in the required directions (see Forrest 1983 and Hardy 1989 for useful collagen reviews). As the granulation tissue matures, there is a process of devascularisation with obliteration of the lumen of the vessels.

 
Remodelling Events

 

The remodelling phase primarily involves the refinement of the collagen and its associated extracellular matrix. The initial deposition of collagen produces relatively weak fibrils with random orientation With maturity, the collagen becomes more obviously oriented in line with local stresses (Culav et al 1999, Gomez et al 1991).

A proportion of the original fine (Type III) collagen is reabsorbed (due to the action of collagenases) and is replaced with Type I collagen with more cross links and greater tensile strength (Vanables 1989, Forrest 1983). Collagen synthesis and lysis both occur at a greater rate in a normal wound compared with non wounded tissue as old fibrous tissue is removed and new scar tissue is laid down. The maturing scar is therefore a dynamic system rather than a static one.

Figure 9 : Principal events of remodelling

There are several influential factors during this long phase, including physical stress. This remodelling process is initiated whilst the proliferative stage proceeds, therefore providing a considerable overlap between the phases. Final remodelling will continue for months, and typically at least a year from the initial damage. See Hardy (1989) for a comprehensive consideration of collagen behaviour in remodelling and Culav et al  (1999) for an excellent review of collagen and its roles). The potential mechanism by which physical stress can influence cell and tissue behaviour is usefully considered by Ingber (2003, 2008). Kahn and Scott (2009) and Killian et al (2012) provide more recent papers linking mechanical stress and tissue repair, as do Bring et al (2007) and Cyr and Ross (1998) whilst Mackey et al (2008) also provide a valuable review. Dunn and Olmedo (2015) have revitalised this topic to useful effect.

 

It is suggested that the strength of the final repair, whilst impressive, will not match that of the pre-injury strength, as illustrated in Figure 10 (after Lin et al, 2004)

Figure 10 : Representation of regained tissue strength (after Lin et al, 2004)

 

Factors known to delay healing are divided into general and local:

 

General: Age, Protein deficiency, Low Vitamin C levels, Steroids & NSAID's (inhibitory effect), Temperature (lower rate when colder)

Local: Poor blood supply / ischeamia, Adhesion to bone or other underlying tissue, Prolonged inflammation, Drying of the wound, Excessive movement or mechanical stress (restarts inflammation)

 

Therapy Influences :

 

Clearly the effects of the whole range of therapies can not be considered in any significant detail here but in principle a therapy which is beneficial to the repair events is a therapy which stimulates rather than ‘changes’ the natural sequence. Promoting or stimulating the inflammatory events is not intended to achieve a ‘bigger’ inflammatory response, but to maximise its efficiency. Similarly, if delivering therapy during the proliferative phase, there would be no benefit in simply creating a bigger volume of scar tissue. The advantage of appropriate intervention is that it stimulates a maximally efficient response, and therefore the required repair material is generated with best quality and minimal time. In the remodelling phase, the refinement of the scar tissue is the aim and the use of therapy can have a significant effect, especially given the growing body of evidence relating the effects of mechanical stress and collagen behaviour.

 

Inappropriate therapy at any stage is perfectly capable of inhibiting these events and therefore results in a less good repair – therapy is not guaranteed to be beneficial – one has to be mindful of the events needed and be selective of the most appropriate (evidenced) therapy at each stage.

Figure 11: The concept of multiple influences of therapy on the tissue repair events (Watson, 2011)

The mode of action of those therapies, historically employed, is actually a lot more complex than was originally conceived and hitherto understood.

 

The other interesting recent development is that there is an increasing body of knowledge which supports the idea that existing therapies have an effect on the chemical environment of the repairing tissue (Figure 12; Watson, 2011, 2016). Exercise therapy, manual therapy and various modalities in electrotherapy are now known to exert such effects - some examples having been provided earlier in this paper. This need not ‘replace’ the current explanations for the mode of action of therapy, but do offer an extended effects model in which there are mechanical, neurological, gross physiological, chemical and bioelectric effects of therapy.

 

In a recent review (Watson, 2016) of the literature, it looks more and more convincingly like there is a common mode of action for all core therapies (taken as exercise, manual therapy and electrophysical at the very least). There must be a mechanism by which each of these therapeutic interventions achieves its end result. The stimulation of chemical mediation pathways appears to be a strong contender for such a common mode – maybe a ‘lowest common denominator’ concept might work here?

If one looks, for example, the effect of various therapies in stimulating bone growth – something that is common to all therapy modes – and look at the commonality of the chemical pathways, the degree of overlap is highly significant.

Figure 12: Numerous Therapy modes are known to Influence Chemical Mediation systems associated with Inflammation and Repair

It is of course, distinctly possible that therapy (a) might be more effective than therapy (b), but the fact that more than one therapy mode stimulates the same chemically mediated pathway is of potential value.

 

An example of this common mode of action is shown in Figure 13 below, taken from the 2016 IFOMPT presentation on this very topic.

Figure 13: Example of different therapies stimulating common chemical mediation pathways – in this example, for enhanced bone healing

Conclusion :

Tissue healing is a complex and dynamic system which enables effective repair of damaged tissue. The repair control system and links between its various components are complex, and there is an ever increasing volume of literature which continues to identify new mediators, cytokines and variants. Whilst this knowledge base continues to expand, the links between the effects of therapy and these chemical control systems is also growing.

 

There is little doubt that appropriate therapy has the capacity to influence the process in a positive way and the most logical and best evidenced approach to intervention is to stimulate or promote the ‘normal’ events rather than trying to change them to something better. If repair is underway, then keep it moving. If it is delayed, then stimulate it in order to help get it back on track. Whilst there are myriad approaches, those that are most effective appear to follow this philosophy.

 
References :

 

There is a chapter in the new edition of the textbook which covers this material

Watson (2020) Chapter 3 : Physiological Principles - Soft Tissue Healing and Repair IN Watson, T. and Nussbaum, E. Electrophysical Agents: Evidence Based Practice. Elsevier

Aller, M. A. et al. (2006). "The inflammatory response: an efficient way of life." Med Sci Monit 12(10): RA225-234.

 

Azuma, Y. et al. (2001). "Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound accelerates rat femoral fracture healing by acting on the various cellular reactions in the fracture callus." J Bone Miner Res 16(4): 671-680.

 

Beck, A. et al. (2005). "Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in the perioperative phase in traumatology and orthopedics effects on bone healing." Oper Orthop Traumatol 17(6): 569-578.

 

Best, T. M. et al. (2013). "Stem cells, angiogenesis and muscle healing: a potential role in massage therapies?" Postgrad Med J 89(1057): 666-670.

 

Binderman, I. et al. (1984). "Biochemical pathways involved in the translation of physical stimulus into biological message." Calcif Tiss Int 36: S82-S85.

 

Bossini, P. et al. (2009). "Low-level laser therapy (670 nm) on viability of random skin flap in rats." Lasers Med Sci 24(2): 209-213.

 

Boursinos, L. et al. (2009). "Do steroids, conventional non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and selective Cox-2 inhibitors adversely affect fracture healing?" J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact 9(1): 44-52.

 

Bray, R. et al. (2002). "Vascular physiology and long-term healing of partial ligament tears." J Orthop Res 20(5): 984-989.

 

Bring, D. et al. (2007). "Physical activity modulates nerve plasticity and stimulates repair after Achilles tendon rupture." J Orthop Res 25(2): 164-172.

 

Broughton, G. et al. (2006). "The basic science of wound healing." Plast Reconstr Surg 117(7 Suppl): 12S-34S.

 

Bossini, P. et al. (2009). "Low-level laser therapy (670 nm) on viability of random skin flap in rats." Lasers Med Sci 24(2): 209-213.

 

Butterfield, T. et al. (2006). "The dual roles of neutrophils and macrophages in inflammation: a critical balance between tissue damage and repair." J Athl Train 41(4): 457-465.

 

Calatroni, A. et al. (2008). "Transient increase with strenuous exercise of plasma levels of glycosaminoglycans in humans and horses." Connect Tissue Res 49(6): 416-425.

 

Chamberlain, C. et al. (2011). "The influence of macrophage depletion on ligament healing." Connect Tissue Res 52(3): 203-211.

 

Chan and Fu (2009). "Anti-inflammatory management for tendon injuries - friends or foes?" Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Ther Technol 1(1): 23.

 

Chao, Y. et al. (2008). "Effects of shock waves on tenocyte proliferation and extracellular matrix metabolism." Ultrasound Med Biol 34(5): 841-852.

 

Cheung, W. et al. (2011). "Low intensity pulsed ultrasound enhances fracture healing in both ovariectomy-induced osteoporotic and age-matched normal bones." J Orthop Res.

 

Connizzo, B. et al. (2014). "The detrimental effects of systemic Ibuprofen delivery on tendon healing are time-dependent." Clin Orthop Relat Res 472(8): 2433-2439

 

Culav, E. et al. (1999). "Connective tissues : Matrix composition and its relevance to physical therapy." Physical Therapy 79(3): 308-319.

 

Cyr, L. and R. Ross (1998). "How controlled stress affects healing tissues." Journal of Hand Therapy 11(2): 125-130.

 

Dakin, S. et al. (2014). "Resolving an inflammatory concept: The importance of inflammation and resolution in tendinopathy." Vet Immunol Immunopathol 158(3-4): 121-127.

 

Dideriksen, K. (2014). "Muscle and tendon connective tissue adaptation to unloading, exercise and NSAID." Connect Tissue Res 55(2): 61-70.

 

Dierich, M. et al. (1987). "Inflammation and phagocytosis." J Clin Chem Clin Biochem 25: 785-793.

 

Dimmen, S. et al. (2009). "The effect of parecoxib and indometacin on tendon-to-bone healing in a bone tunnel: an experimental study in rats." J Bone Joint Surg Br 91(2): 259-263.

 

dos Santos, S. et al. (2014). "Comparative analysis of two low-level laser doses on the expression of inflammatory mediators and on neutrophils and macrophages in acute joint inflammation." Lasers Med Sci 29(3): 1051-1058.

 

Dunn, S. L. and M. L. Olmedo (2015). "Mechanotransduction: Relevance to Physical Therapist Practice-Understanding Our Ability to Affect Genetic Expression Through Mechanical Forces." Phys Ther 96(5): 712-721.

 

Egozi, E. et al. (2003). "Mast cells modulate the inflammatory but not the proliferative response in healing wounds." Wound Repair Regen 11(1): 46-54.

 

Eliasson, P. et al. (2012). "Achilles tendon healing in rats is improved by intermittent mechanical loading during the inflammatory phase." J Orthop Res 30(2): 274-279.

 

Evans & Stanish (2000)
The basic science of tendon injuries
Current Orthopaedics 14;403-412

 

Fenwick, S.et al. (2002). "The vasculature and its role in the damaged and healing tendon." Arthritis Res 4: 252-260.

 

Fitzsimmons, R.et al. (2008). "A pulsing electric field (PEF) increases human chondrocyte proliferation through a transduction pathway involving nitric oxide signaling." J Orthop Res 26(6): 854-859.

 

Forrest, L. (1983). "Current concepts in soft connective tissue wound healing." Br J Surgery 70: 133-140.

 

Frick, M.and N. Murthy (2010). "Imaging of the elbow: muscle and tendon injuries." Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 14(4): 430-437.

 

Fujiwara, Y. et al. (2005). "Down-regulation of basic fibroblast growth factor production from cartilage by excessive mechanical stress." J Orthop Sci 10(6): 608-613.

 

Gabbiani, G. (2003). "The myofibroblast in wound healing and fibrocontractive diseases." J Pathol 200(4): 500-503.

 

Gomez, M. et al. (1991). "The effects of increased tension on healing medical collateral ligaments." Am J Sports Med 19(4): 347-354.

 

Granger, D. and E. Senchenkova (2010). Inflammation and the Microcirculation. San Francisco, Morgan and Claypool.

 

Gurtner, G. et al. (2008). "Wound repair and regeneration." Nature 453(7193): 314-321.

 

Handschin, C. and B. Spiegelman (2008). "The role of exercise and PGC1[alpha] in inflammation and chronic disease." Nature 454(7203): 463-469.

 

Hardy, M. (1989). "The biology of scar formation." Physical Therapy 69(12): 1014-1024.

 

Hildebrand, K. et al. (1998). "The effects of platelet-derived growth factor-BB on healing of the rabbit medial collateral ligament. An in vivo study." Am J Sports Med 26(4): 549-554.

 

Hill, M. et al. (2003). "Muscle satellite (stem) cell actiation during local tissue injury and repair." J Anat 203: 89-99.

 

Hinz, B. and G. Gabbiani (2003). "Mechanisms of force generation and transmission by myofibroblasts." Curr Opin Biotechnol 14(5): 538-546.

 

Hurley, J. (1985). Inflammation. Muir's Textbook of Pathology. J.R.Anderson.

 

Hurst, S. et al. (2001). "IL-6 and Its Soluble Receptor Orchestrate a Temporal Switch in the Pattern of Leukocyte Recruitment Seen during Acute Inflammation." Immunity 14(6): 705-714.

 

Ingber, D. (2003). "Mechanobiology and diseases of mechanotransduction." Annals of Medicine 35: 564-577.

 

Ingber, D. (2008). "Tensegrity and mechanotransduction." J Bodyw Mov Ther 12(3): 198-200.

 

Jimenez, P. and S. Jimenez (2004). "Tissue and cellular approaches to wound repair." The American Journal of Surgery 187: 56s-64s.

 

Jarvinen, T. et al. (2005). "Muscle injuries: biology and treatment." Am J Sports Med 33(5): 745-764.

 

Kaada, B. and O. Torsteinbo (1989). "Increase of plasma beta-endorphins in connective tissue massage." Gen Pharmacol 20(4): 487-489.

 

Khan, K. and A. Scott (2009). "Mechanotherapy: how physical therapists' prescription of exercise promotes tissue repair." Br J Sports Med 43(4): 247-252.

 

Khanna, A. et al. (2009). "The effects of LIPUS on soft-tissue healing: a review of literature." Br Med Bull 89: 169-182.

 

Kido, S. et al. (2009). "Mechanical stress induces Interleukin-11 expression to stimulate osteoblast differentiation." Bone 45(6): 1125-1132.

 

Killian, M. et al. (2012). "The role of mechanobiology in tendon healing." J Shoulder Elbow Surg 21(2): 228-237.

 

Kuo, Y. et al. (2009). "Extracorporeal shock-wave therapy enhanced wound healing via increasing topical blood perfusion and tissue regeneration in a rat model of STZ-induced diabetes." Wound Repair Regen 17(4): 522-530.

 

Leung, M. et al. (2006). "Therapeutic ultrasound enhances medial collateral ligament repair in rats." Ultrasound Med Biol 32(3): 449-452.

 

Li, J. et al. (2007). "Pathophysiology of acute wound healing." Clin Dermatol 25(1): 9-18.

 

Li, J. et al. (2003). "Cytokine release from osteoblasts in response to ultrasound stimulation." Biomaterials 24(13): 2379-2385.

 

Li, W. et al. (2005). "The role of therapeutic angiogenesis in tissue repair and regeneration." Adv Skin Wound Care 18(9): 491-500

 

Li, B. and J. Wang (2011). "Fibroblasts and myofibroblasts in wound healing: Force generation and measurement." Journal of Tissue Viability 20(4): 108-120.

 

Li, Z. et al. (2004). "Inflammatory response of human tendon fibroblasts to cyclic mechanical stretching." Am J Sports Med 32(2): 435-440.

 

Lin, T., et al. (2004). "Biomechanics of tendon injury and repair." Journal of Biomechanics 37(6): 865-877.

 

Lo, I. et al. (2002). "The cellular networks of normal ovine medial collateral and anterior cruciate ligaments are not accurately recapitulated in scar tissue." J Anat 200(3): 283-296.

 

Loghmani, M. and S.Warden (2013). "Instrument-assisted cross fiber massage increases tissue perfusion and alters microvascular morphology in the vicinity of healing knee ligaments." BMC Complement Altern Med 13: 240.

 

Lorena, D. et al. (2002). "Nornal scarring : importance of myofibroblasts." Wound Repair Regen 10(2): 86-92.

 

Lu, H. et al. (2008). "Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound accelerated bone-tendon junction healing through regulation of vascular endothelial growth factor expression and cartilage formation." Ultrasound Med Biol 34(8): 1248-1260.

 

Luster, A. (1998). "Chemokines — Chemotactic Cytokines That Mediate Inflammation." New England Journal of Medicine 338(7): 436-445.

 

Mackey, A. et al. (2008). "Dynamic adaptation of tendon and muscle connective tissue to mechanical loading." Connect Tissue Res 49(3): 165-168.

 

Mackey et al (2012) "Rehabilitation of muscle after injury - the role of anti-inflammatory drugs." Scand J Med Sci Sports 22(4): e8-14

 

Marcos, R. et al. (2011). "Infrared (810 nm) low-level laser therapy in rat achilles tendinitis: a consistent alternative to drugs." Photochem Photobiol 87(6): 1447-1452.

 

Matheny Jr, R. et al. (2010). "Minireview: Mechano-growth factor: a putative product of IGF-I gene expression involved in tissue repair and regeneration." Endocrinology 151(3): 865-875.

 

McAnulty, R. (2007). "Fibroblasts and myofibroblasts: their source, function and role in disease." Int J Biochem Cell Biol 39(4): 666-671.

 

McBrier, N. et al. (2007). "Therapeutic ultrasound decreases mechano-growth factor messenger ribonucleic acid expression after muscle contusion injury." Arch Phys Med Rehabil 88(7): 936-940.

 

Medzhitov, R. (2008). "Origin and physiological roles of inflammation." Nature 454(7203): 428-435.

 

Mesquita-Ferrari, R. et al. (2011). "Effects of low-level laser therapy on expression of TNF-alpha and TGF-beta in skeletal muscle during the repair process." Lasers Med Sci 26(3): 335-340.

 

Metz, M. et al. (2007). "Mast cells in the promotion and limitation of chronic inflammation." Immunol Rev 217: 304-328.

 

Metz, M. and M. Maurer (2007). "Mast cells--key effector cells in immune responses." Trends Immunol 28(5): 234-241.

 

Millar, N et al. (2010). "Inflammation is present in early human tendinopathy." Am J Sports Med 38(10): 2085-2091.

 

Moerch, L. et al. (2013). "The effect of acute exercise on collagen turnover in human tendons: influence of prior immobilization period." Eur J Appl Physiol 113(2): 449-455.

 

Molloy, T. et al. (2003). "The roles of growth factors in tendon and ligament healing." Sports-Med. 33(5): 381-394.

 

Nelson, N. (2013). "Delayed onset muscle soreness: Is massage effective?" Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies 17(4): 475-482.

 

Neidlinger-Wilke, C. et al. (2002). "Fibroblast orientation to stretch begins within three hours." J Orthop Res 20(5): 953-956.

 

Niinikoski, J. (1979). Current concepts in wound nutrition. Symposium on Wound Healing, Helsinki, Finland, A Lindgren & Soner.

 

Nussbaum, E. and M. Locke (2007). "Heat shock protein expression in rat skeletal muscle after repeated applications of pulsed and continuous ultrasound." Arch Phys Med Rehabil 88(6): 785-790.

 

Oryan, A. et al. (2012). "Short and long terms healing of the experimentally transverse sectioned tendon in rabbits." Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Ther Technol 4(1): 14.

 

Ostrowski, K. et al. (2000). "Physical activity and plasma interleukin-6 in humans--effect of intensity of exercise." Eur J Appl Physiol 83(6): 512-515.

 

Palomares, K. et al. (2009). "Mechanical stimulation alters tissue differentiation and molecular expression during bone healing." J Orthop Res 27(9): 1123-1132.

 

Peacock, E. (1984). Wound Repair, W B Saunders.

 

Pires, D. et al. (2011). "Low-level laser therapy (LLLT; 780 nm) acts differently on mRNA expression of anti- and pro-inflammatory mediators in an experimental model of collagenase-induced tendinitis in rat." Lasers Med Sci 26(1): 85-94.

 

Pitzer, J. (2006). Progress in Inflammation Research, Nova Science Pub Inc.

 

Poltawski, L. and T. Watson (2009). "Bioelectricity and microcurrent therapy for tissue healing - a narrative review." Physical Therapy Reviews 14(2): 104-114.

 

Radi, Z. and N. Khan (2005). "Effects of cyclooxygenase inhibition on bone, tendon, and ligament healing." Inflamm Res 54(9): 358-366.

 

Rankin, J. (2004). "Biological mediators of acute inflammation." AACN Clinical Issues: Advanced Practice in Acute and Critical Care 15(1): 3-17.

 

Rees, J. et al. (2014). "Tendons - time to revisit inflammation." Br J Sports Med 48(21): 1553-1557.

 

Rego, E. et al. (2010). "Ultrasound stimulation induces PGE(2) synthesis promoting cementoblastic differentiation through EP2/EP4 receptor pathway." Ultrasound Med Biol 36(6): 907-915.

 

Reher, P. et al. (2002). "Ultrasound stimulates nitric oxide and prostaglandin E2 production by human osteoblasts." Bone 31(1): 236-241.

 

Rompe, J. et al. (2008). "Mid-portion Achilles tendinopathy--current options for treatment." Disabil Rehabil 30(20-22): 1666-1676.

 

Roques, C. (2002). "Massage applied to scars." Wound Repair Regen 10(2): 126-128

 

Rutkowski, M.. et al. (2010). "The complement cascade as a mediator of tissue growth and regeneration." Inflamm Res 59(11): 897-905.

 

Safavi, S. et al. (2008). "Effects of low-level He-Ne laser irradiation on the gene expression of IL-1beta, TNF-alpha, IFN-gamma, TGF-beta, bFGF, and PDGF in rat's gingiva." Lasers Med Sci 23(3): 331-335.

 

Sakurai, T. et al. (2008). "Enhanced secretion of prostaglandin E2 from osteoblasts by exposure to a strong static magnetic field." Bioelectromagnetics 29(4): 277-283.

 

Sawasaki, I. et al. (2009). "Effect of low-intensity laser therapy on mast cell degranulation in human oral mucosa." Lasers Med Sci 24(1): 113-116.

 

Saygun, I. et al. (2008). "Effects of laser irradiation on the release of basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF), insulin like growth factor-1 (IGF-1), and receptor of IGF-1 (IGFBP3) from gingival fibroblasts." Lasers Med Sci 23(2): 211-215.

 

Schulze-Tanzil, G. et al. (2011). "The role of pro-inflammatory and immunoregulatory cytokines in tendon healing and rupture: new insights." Scand J Med Sci Sports 21(3): 337-351.

 

Scott, A., et al. (2008). "Mechanotransduction in human bone: in vitro cellular physiology that underpins bone changes with exercise." Sports Med 38(2): 139-160.

 

Serhan, C. et al. (2010). Fundamentals of inflammation. Cambridge ; New York, Cambridge University Press.

 

Sharma, P. and N. Maffulli (2005). "Tendon injury and tendinopathy: healing and repair." J Bone Joint Surg Am 87(1): 187-202.

 

Shin, T. and J. S. Bordeaux (2012). "The role of massage in scar management: a literature review." Dermatol Surg 38(3): 414-423.

 

Silverberg, R. et al. (1996). "The effects of soft tissue mobilization on the immature burn scar: results of a pilot study." J Burn Care Rehabil 17(3): 252-259.

 

Singer, A. and R. Clark (1999). "Cutaneous wound healing." N Engl J Med 341(10): 738-746.

 

Smith, C. et al. (2008). "The inflammatory response to skeletal muscle injury: illuminating complexities." Sports Med 38(11): 947-969.

 

Stegen, S. et al. (2015). "Bringing new life to damaged bone: the importance of angiogenesis in bone repair and regeneration." Bone 70(0): 19-27.

 

Stoltz, J. (2012). "Response of cells and tissues to mechanical stimulations." Series on Biomechanics 27(1-2): 17-32.

 

Sugita, Y. et al. (2008). "Nitric oxide generation directly responds to ultrasound exposure." Ultrasound Med Biol 34(3): 487-493.

 

Takao, M. et al. (2011). "Role of heme oxygenase-1 in inflammatory response induced by mechanical stretch in synovial cells." Inflamm Res 60(9): 861-867.

 

Taljanovic, M. et al. (2011). "Humeral avulsion of the inferior glenohumeral ligament in college female volleyball players caused by repetitive microtrauma." Am J Sports Med 39(5): 1067-1076.

 

Threlkeld, A. (1992). "The effects of manual therapy on connective tissue." Phys Ther 72(12): 893-902.

 

Thornton, G. and D. Hart (2011). "The interface of mechanical loading and biological variables as they pertain to the development of tendinosis." J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact 11(2): 94-10

 

Vanable, J. (1989). Integumentary potentials and wound healing. Electric Fields in Vertebrate Repair. R. Borgens. New York, Alan Liss Inc: 171-224.

 

Velnar, T. et al. (2009). "The Wound Healing Process: an Overview of the Cellular and Molecular Mechanisms." The Journal of International Medical Research 37(5): 1528-1542.

 

Vernon Roberts, B. (1988). "Inflammation 1987; An overview." Agents Actions Suppl 24: 1-18.

 

Villeco, J. (2012). "Edema: a silent but important factor." J Hand Ther 25(2): 153-161

 

Vincent, H. et al. (2014). "Acute Effects of Enhanced Eccentric and Concentric Resistance Exercise on Metabolism and Inflammation." Journal of Novel Physiotherapies 4: 200.

 

Wagner, S. et al. (2003). "Comparison of inflammatory and systemic sources of growth factors in acute and chronic human wounds." Wound Repair and Regeneration 11(4): 253-260.

 

Walter, J. and M. Israel (1987). General Pathology, Churchill Livingstone.

 

Wang, C. et al. (2011). "The effects of shockwave on systemic concentrations of nitric oxide level, angiogenesis and osteogenesis factors in hip necrosis." Rheumatol Int 31(7): 871-877.

 

Wang, J. et al. (2012). "Tendon biomechanics and mechanobiology--a minireview of basic concepts and recent advancements." J Hand Ther 25(2): 133-140

 

Watson, T. (2003). "Soft Tissue Healing." In Touch 104: 2-9.

 

Watson, T. (2006). "Tissue repair: The current state of the art." Sportex-Medicine. 28: 8-12.

 

Watson, T. (2008). Electrical Properties of Tissues. Electrotherapy : Evidence Based Practice. T. Watson. Edinburgh, Churchill Livingstone / Elsevier: 37-52.

 

Watson, T., Ed. (2008). Electrotherapy : Evidence Based Practice. Edinburgh, Churchill Livingstone - Elsevier.

 

Watson, T. (2011). An Extended Model of Physical Therapy Modes of Action. 16th International WCPT Congress. Amsterdam, Physiotherapy (2011)(). 97: A-210-0032-02387.

 

Watson, T. (2016) Expanding our Understanding of the Inflammatory Process and its Role in Pain & Tissue Healing. IFOMPT, 4-8 July, Glasgow

 

Watson, T. (2020) Tissue Repair : Ch 3 in Electrophysical Agents: Evidence Based Practice. Ed Watson + Nussbaum, Elsevier

 

Widgerow, A. (2012). "Cellular resolution of inflammation--catabasis." Wound Repair Regen 20(1): 2-7.

 

Wipff, P. and B. Hinz (2009). "Myofibroblasts work best under stress." J Bodyw Mov Ther 13(2): 121-127.

 

Zederfeldt, B. (1979). Factors influencing wound healing. Symposium on Wound Healing, Helsinki, Finland, A Lindgren & Soner.

 

Zhang, S. et al. (2004). "Non-opioid-dependent anti-inflammatory effects of low frequency electroacupuncture." Brain Res Bull 62(4): 327-334.

 

Zhang, X. et al. (2014). "The dose-effect relationship in extracorporeal shock wave therapy: the optimal parameter for extracorporeal shock wave therapy." J Surg Res 186(1): 484-492.

 

Zhang, J. and J. Wang (2010). "Mechanobiological response of tendon stem cells: implications of tendon homeostasis and pathogenesis of tendinopathy." J Orthop Res 28(5): 639-643.

 

Zhao, M. et al. (2004). "Electrical stimulation directly induces pre-angiogenic responses in vascular endothelial cells by signaling through VEGF receptors." J Cell Sci 117(Pt 3): 397-405.

 

Vibration + Healing Effects

 

Chung, S. et al. (2014). "Low-magnitude high-frequency vibration enhances gene expression related to callus formation, mineralization and remodeling during osteoporotic fracture healing in rats." J Orthop Res 32(12): 1572-1579.

 

Chow, D. et al. (2011). "Low-magnitude high-frequency vibration (LMHFV) enhances bone remodeling in osteoporotic rat femoral fracture healing." J Orthop Res 29(5): 746-752.

 

Ennis, W. J. et al (2016) Advanced Technologies to Improve Wound Healing: Electrical Stimulation, Vibration Therapy, and Ultrasound-What Is the Evidence? Plast Reconstr Surg 138(3 Suppl): 94S

 

Friedl, K. et al. (2008). "Stress fracture and military medical readiness: bridging basic and applied research." Med Sci Sports Exerc 40(11 Suppl): S609-622.

 

Lage, V. K. S. et al (2018) Acute Effects of Whole-Body Vibration on Inflammatory Markers in People with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Pilot Study Rehabil Res Pract 2018: 5480214

 

Leung, K. et al. (2009). "Low-magnitude high-frequency vibration accelerates callus formation, mineralization, and fracture healing in rats." J Orthop Res 27(4): 458-465.

 

Lohman, E. et al. (2007). "The effect of whole body vibration on lower extremity skin blood flow in normal subjects." Med Sci Monit 13(2): CR71-76.

 

Saxena, A. et al. (2013). "Vibration and pressure wave therapy for calf strains: a proposed treatment." Muscles Ligaments Tendons J 3(2): 60-62.

 

Wehrle, E. et al. (2014). "Distinct frequency dependent effects of whole-body vibration on non-fractured bone and fracture healing in mice." Journal of Orthopaedic Research 32(8): 1006-1013.

 

Wilson, J. et al. (2002). "Healing venous ulcers with cycloidal multidirectional vibration therapy." Journal of Wound Care 11(10): 395-398.

 

Effects of Traditional and LIPUS Ultrasound on Healing Mediators

 

Khanna, A. et al. (2009). "The effects of LIPUS on soft-tissue healing: a review of literature." Br Med Bull 89: 169-182

 

Leung, M. et al. (2006). "Therapeutic ultrasound enhances medial collateral ligament repair in rats." Ultrasound Med Biol 32(3): 449-452.

 

Li, J. et al. (2003). "Cytokine release from osteoblasts in response to ultrasound stimulation." Biomaterials 24(13): 2379-2385.

 

McBrier, N. (2005). Influence of post-injury ultrasound treatments on skeletal muscle regeneration. Physical Activity and Educational Services, Ohio State University. PhD

 

Nussbaum, E. and M. Locke (2007). "Heat shock protein expression in rat skeletal muscle after repeated applications of pulsed and continuous ultrasound." Arch Phys Med Rehabil 88(6): 785-790

 

Padilla, F. et al. (2014). "Stimulation of bone repair with ultrasound: a review of the possible mechanic effects." Ultrasonics 54(5): 1125-1145.

 

Rego, E. et al. (2010). "Ultrasound stimulation induces PGE(2) synthesis promoting cementoblastic differentiation through EP2/EP4 receptor pathway." Ultrasound Med Biol 36(6): 907-915.

 

Sahu, N. et al (2019) Continuous low-intensity ultrasound attenuates IL-6 and TNFalpha-induced catabolic effects and repairs chondral fissures in bovine osteochondral explants BMC Musculoskelet Disord 20(1): 193

 

Wilson, C. et al. (2014). "Patterning expression of regenerative growth factors using high intensity focused ultrasound." Tissue Eng Part C Methods 20(10): 769-779.

 

Xia, P. et al. (2015). "Low-Intensity Pulsed Ultrasound Affects Chondrocyte Extracellular Matrix Production via an Integrin-Mediated p38 MAPK Signaling Pathway." Ultrasound Med Biol 41(6): 1690-1700.

 

Zhu, H. et al. (2015). "Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound enhances bone repair in a rabbit model of steroid-associated osteonecrosis." Clin Orthop Relat Res 473(5): 1830-1839.

 

Effects of Laser based Therapy systems on Healing Mediators

 

Bjordal, J. et al. (2006). "A randomised, placebo controlled trial of low level laser therapy for activated Achilles tendinitis with microdialysis measurement of peritendinous prostaglandin E2 concentrations." Br J Sports Med 40(1): 76-80; discussion 76-80.

 

Fernandes, K. et al. (2015). "Photobiomodulation with 660-nm and 780-nm laser on activated J774 macrophage-like cells: Effect on M1 inflammatory markers." J Photochem Photobiol B 153: 344-351.

 

Hochman, B. et al. (2014). "Low-level laser therapy and light-emitting diode effects in the secretion of neuropeptides SP and CGRP in rat skin." Lasers Med Sci 29(3): 1203-1208.

 

Marcos, R. et al. (2011). "Infrared (810 nm) low-level laser therapy in rat achilles tendinitis: a consistent alternative to drugs." Photochem Photobiol 87(6): 1447-1452.

 

Mesquita-Ferrari, et al. (2011). "Effects of low-level laser therapy on expression of TNF-alpha and TGF-beta in skeletal muscle during the repair process." Lasers Med Sci 26(3): 335-340.

 

Moreira, S. H. et al (2020) Evaluation of angiogenesis, inflammation, and healing on irradiated skin graft with low-level laser therapy in rats (Rattus norvegicus albinus wistar) Lasers Med Sci 35(5): 1103

 

Pires, D. et al. (2011). "Low-level laser therapy (LLLT; 780 nm) acts differently on mRNA expression of anti- and pro-inflammatory mediators in an experimental model of collagenase-induced tendinitis in rat." Lasers Med Sci 26(1): 85-94.

 

Safavi, S. et al. (2008). "Effects of low-level He-Ne laser irradiation on the gene expression of IL-1beta, TNF-alpha, IFN-gamma, TGF-beta, bFGF, and PDGF in rat's gingiva." Lasers Med Sci 23(3): 331-335.

 

Saygun, I. et al. (2008). "Effects of laser irradiation on the release of basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF), insulin like growth factor-1 (IGF-1), and receptor of IGF-1 (IGFBP3) from gingival fibroblasts." Lasers Med Sci 23(2): 211-215.

 

Tim, C. et al. (2015). "Effects of low level laser therapy on inflammatory and angiogenic gene expression during the process of bone healing: A microarray analysis." J Photochem Photobiol B 154: 8-15.

 

Wang, L. et al. (2015). "Modulation of extracellular ATP content of mast cells and DRG neurons by irradiation: studies on underlying mechanism of low-level-laser therapy." Mediators Inflamm 2015: 630361.

 

Zhou, J. et al. (2008). "Increased expression of heat shock protein 70 and heat shock factor 1 in chronic dermal ulcer tissues treated with laser-aided therapy." Chin Med J (Engl) 121(14): 1269-1273.

 

Effects of Electrical Stimulation based therapy on Healing Mediators

 

Ferroni, P. et al. (2005). "Biological effects of a software-controlled voltage pulse generator (PhyBack PBK-2C) on the release of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)." In Vivo 19(6): 949-958.

 

Hussin, A. et al. (2012). "Effect of reversed polarity microcurrent electrical stimulation on an experimentally induced Achilles tendon injury in male albino rats: A histological and immunohistochemical study." Egyptian Journal of Histology 35(1): 74-86.

 

Jeon, J.-K. et al. (2015). "Effects of high voltage pulsed current stimulation with a visible contraction intensity on expression of TGF-β1 and synthesis of type I collagen in wound-induced white rats." Journal of Physical Therapy Science 27(5): 1485-1490.

 

Kim, H. et al. (2006). "The anti-inflammatory effects of low- and high-frequency electroacupuncture are mediated by peripheral opioids in a mouse air pouch inflammation model." Journal of Alternative & Complementary Medicine 12(1): 39-44.

 

Kubota, K. et al. (1995). "Overview of effects of electrical stimulation on osteogenesis and alveolar bone." J Periodontol 66(1): 2-6.

 

Petrofsky, J. et al. (2005). "Effects of electrical stimulation on skin blood flow in controls and in and around stage III and IV wounds in hairy and non hairy skin." Med Sci Monit 11(7): CR309-316.

 

Reid, B. and M. Zhao (2014). "The Electrical Response to Injury: Molecular Mechanisms and Wound Healing." Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle) 3(2): 184-201.

 

Zhao, M. et al. (2004). "Electrical stimulation directly induces pre-angiogenic responses in vascular endothelial cells by signaling through VEGF receptors." J Cell Sci 117(Pt 3): 397-405.